<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martin Wolf&#039;s weblog &#187; voip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mwolf.net/archive/tag/voip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mwolf.net</link>
	<description>Software development and assorted geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 18:15:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>FritzBox!</title>
		<link>http://mwolf.net/archive/fritzbox-rocks/</link>
		<comments>http://mwolf.net/archive/fritzbox-rocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cool-tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fritzbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speedtouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xs4all]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwolf.net/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AVM FritzBox is really cool and it certainly beats the hell out of my Thompson Speedtouch. But what about that suspicous "permit [remote] automatic updates" option which I am not allowed to disable?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!</p>
<p>I received my <a href="http://www.fritzbox.eu/en/index.php">FritzBox</a> 7170 today, as a present from XS4ALL for renewing my ADSL subscription for another year (cheap deal &#8212; I would have done that anyway). And it totally blows away my Thompson Speedtouch!</p>
<p><span id="more-71"></span></p>
<p>As regular readers of this blog may remember, the Speedtouch doesn&#8217;t properly support the &#8220;exposed host&#8221; feature, whereby all incoming traffic on any port is redirected to a single machine on the internal network, in combination with Voice Over IP. I eventually came up with a <a href="http://mwolf.net/archive/voip-on-speedtouch/">really crappy workaround</a> for that, but it never really worked nicely. Also, I never quite managed to explain to the Speedtouch that when a machine on the internal network tried to access 82.95.250.5, it should be sent to the internal address of my server, rather than get stuck in a loop trying to forward traffic to itself.</p>
<p>Well, the FritzBox didn&#8217;t have either of these problems. Port forwarding was just a few mouse-clicks away, and configuring VOIP in combination with that was trivially easy. Despite the fact that the router seems to have much more options than my Speedtouch (in &#8216;Expert mode&#8217;, at least), it is much easier to configure thanks to the well-organized menu structure.</p>
<p>So now I have it setup exactly the way I want it: all external traffic gets forwarder to my Linux server at 10.0.0.1, VOIP is handled by the FritzBox (I can even connect my ISDN modem to it!) and when a machine on the WLAN wants to access mwolf.net, it gets sent to 10.0.0.1 as it should. I couldn&#8217;t be happier.</p>
<p>Except.. There is one setting in the menu which worries me a bit. On the &#8220;Provider Services&#8221; tab of the &#8220;Network&#8221; menu, there is an option called &#8220;Permit automatic updates&#8221; which apparently allows my service provider to change the device&#8217;s settings without having to ask my permission. This setting is enabled and the checkbox is greyed-out so that I cannot disable it:</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 760px"><img title="Suspicious checkbox" src="http://mwolf.net/images/fritzbox.png" alt="Suspicious checkbox" width="750" height="212" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Suspicious checkbox</p></div>
<p>Needless to say, I don&#8217;t really like the idea of anybody being able to mess around with the gateway to my local network without my consent. Now, I do generally trust XS4ALL, which has a reputation to uphold when it comes to respecting its users&#8217; digital autonomy and privacy, so I assume that there&#8217;s an innocent reason for the fact that this checkbox cannot be easily unchecked by the user. I have already mailed AVM, the makers of the FritzBox, about this, and I plan to contact XS4ALL tomorrow. Let&#8217;s see what they say about it.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> false alarm, fortunately! Turns out it&#8217;s just a bit of a misleading user interface. The &#8220;permit automatic updates&#8221; option is dependent on the &#8220;allow automatic configuration&#8221; option above it. So when the latter is disabled, the former becomes greyed-out because it is no longer applicable. However, the software remembers what it was set to, resulting in a checkbox which incorrectly suggests that it is still enabled. If it makes you feel better, you can temporarily re-enable the &#8220;allow automatic configuration&#8221; option, then uncheck the &#8220;permit automatic updates&#8221; box and then disable automatic configuration again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mwolf.net/archive/fritzbox-rocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
