Comments on: Thinking in bits http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/ Software development and assorted geekery Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:06:31 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Self Storage Manchester http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/comment-page-1/#comment-6203 Self Storage Manchester Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:42:06 +0000 http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/#comment-6203 Nice post, keep up the good work:） Nice post, keep up the good work:）

]]> By: shower enclosures http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/comment-page-1/#comment-5156 shower enclosures Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:10:36 +0000 http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/#comment-5156 cool blog jen x cool blog

jen x

]]> By: Sichtschutz http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/comment-page-1/#comment-3802 Sichtschutz Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:11:57 +0000 http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/#comment-3802 Thanks for the interesting information. Thanks for the interesting information.

]]> By: kurye http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/comment-page-1/#comment-3719 kurye Mon, 08 Dec 2008 01:44:43 +0000 http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/#comment-3719 thank you very muchhh thank you very muchhh

]]> By: martin http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/comment-page-1/#comment-3554 martin Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:11:47 +0000 http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/#comment-3554 Off-by-one error fixed, thanks! Off-by-one error fixed, thanks!

]]> By: djcb http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/comment-page-1/#comment-3553 djcb Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:30:39 +0000 http://mwolf.net/archive/thinking-in-bits/#comment-3553 '...or from 0 to 65,536 when unsigned'. off-by-one? oh, and when reading with -pedantic: a byte is usually 8 bits, but there are some (rare, historical) exceptions. which is why networking standards and french refer to a 8-bit quantity as an 'octet' (although even the french recognize the ambivalence...) also, the maximum file name size on ext3 is 255, while on ntfs it's 255 'UTF16'-units (says Wikipedia, which refers to the NTFS docs, which, likely, made exactly the UCS-2-vs-UTF-16 mistake you mention). ‘…or from 0 to 65,536 when unsigned’. off-by-one?

oh, and when reading with -pedantic: a byte is usually 8 bits, but there are some (rare, historical) exceptions. which is why networking standards and french refer to a 8-bit quantity as an ‘octet’ (although even the french recognize the ambivalence…)

also, the maximum file name size on ext3 is 255, while on ntfs it’s 255 ‘UTF16′-units (says Wikipedia, which refers to the NTFS docs, which, likely, made exactly the UCS-2-vs-UTF-16 mistake you mention).

]]>